•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This mixed-methods study aimed to identify multi-level barriers, facilitators, and actionable interventions for recovery following emergency laparotomy, a high-acuity event where traditional clinical metrics often fail to capture the nuances of patients' lived experience during convalescence. We conducted semi-structured interviews and surveys with 15 adults recovering from emergency laparotomy and subsequently completed human-in-the-loop AI-assisted thematic analysis. Findings reveal a ``satisfaction paradox'': despite 93.4% satisfaction with acute hospital care, patients experienced a protracted recovery marked by significant distress across 5 themes: (1) Quality and Coordination of Care; (2) Life Impact and Financial Burden; (3) Patient Education and Information Modalities; (4) Environmental and Social Factors; and (5) Psychological Impact and Personal Resilience. Based on these findings, surgical success did not necessarily translate into positive functional or psychological outcomes. To bridge this recovery gap, healthcare systems must move beyond static discharge models toward human-centered digital solutions that provide asynchronous education and ongoing, active surveillance. Formalizing caregiver roles as clinical partners and addressing systemic financial and administrative barriers, even for fully insured populations, are essential to extending clinical oversight into the place of residence and restoring quality of life.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Share

COinS